Blumenstock Bros. Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This suit was brought by the Blumenstock Brothers Advertising Agency against the Chrtis Publishing Company in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois to recover treble damages under § 7 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. 26 Stat. 209. The case here concerns the question of the jurisdiction of the District Court. Judicial Code, § 238. The plaintiff is a corporation of the State of Missouri, the defendant a corporation of the State of Pennsylvania. The defendant appeared specially in the District Court and movéd to dismiss the complaint for want of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Newburyport Water Co. v. NewburyportSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- North American Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.