Legal Opinion

Berntsen v. Cooper & Lybrand, L.L.P.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 21, 2001No. 99-0434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Chief Justice.

Following a jury trial, the district court sustained the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on several grounds. One of those grounds was that Iowa’s savings statute, Iowa Code section 614.10 (1995), did not apply to save the plaintiffs’ action from being time-barred. Because we agree that section 614.10 does not apply under the facts of this case, we affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P. (C & L), a national accounting firm, audited the consolidated financial statements of Capitol Group and its wholly owned…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gibson v. ITT Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Johnson v. DodgenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Carroll v. MartirSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Gabelmann v. NFO, INC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. Berntsen v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peda v. Fort Dodge Animal Health, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  2. Vanz, LLC v. PMD Financial Group, LLC, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API