Legal Opinion

Peda v. Fort Dodge Animal Health, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided November 24, 2003No. C03-3010-MWBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND THE DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION.976

II. LEGAL DISCUSSION.977

A. Standards For Summary Judgment.977

B. Statute of Limitations.979

1. Arguments of the parties.979

2. Is Peda’s IWPCA claim time-barred?.979

C. Preclusive Effect Of The Peda I Judgment .982

1. Res judicata .982

a. Same parties or their privies.983

b. Same cause of action.;... 984

III. CONCLUSION.986

I. INTRODUCTION

On March 2, 2001, plaintiff Karen Peda (“Peda”) filed a complaint…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cook v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API