Legal Opinion
Discover Bank v. Worsham
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided July 19, 2007No. 104,270PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY L. GOODMAN, Judge.
¶ 1 Cardholder Rae S. Worsham appeals the trial court’s January 3, 2007, order granting summary judgment to Discover Bank (Discover) on its action to collect the balance owed it by Cardholder after Cardholder’s default on her agreement to pay. The appeal was assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36(a)(2), 12 O.S.2001 and Supp.2003, eh. 15, app. 1. Based upon our review of the facts and applicable law, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
¶ 2 Cardholder’s now-deceased husband entered into an agreement with Discover on April…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Webster Drilling Co. v. Sterling Oil of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bononi Ex Rel. Bankruptcy Estate of Zilka v. Bayer Employees Fed. Credit Union (In Re Zilka)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In re WashingtonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Verdini, A. v. First National Bank of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Bradley Ammerman v. Goldman Sachs Bank USADistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
- Faust Corp. v. PriddyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013