Legal Opinion

Bradley Ammerman v. Goldman Sachs Bank USA

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 20, 2026No. 5:25-cv-00539Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA BRADLEY AMMERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-00539-JD ) GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court are Defendant Goldman Sachs Bank USA’s (“GS Bank”) Motion to Compel Arbitration [Doc. No. 9], GS Bank’s Motion to Deem Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration Confessed (“Motion to Deem Confessed”) [Doc. No. 12], and Plaintiff Bradley Ammerman’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 13]. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS GS Bank’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and GRANTS GS Bank’s Motion…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API