Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Malaspina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

The Industrial Commissioner brings here for review a determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which holds that claimant is entitled to unemployment benefits. The question is whether claimant was separated from his employment by his own choice. He is not entitled to benefits under the statute if he “ leaves his employment voluntarily ” and “ without good cause ” (Unemployment Insurance Law [Labor Law, art. 18], § 593, subd. 1, par. [c]).

*565The underlying question is whether a man who fails to keep up his union membership and for this reason alone loses his job in a union shop is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of BaidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. In Re the Claim of MalaspinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. In re the Claim of KarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  4. In re the Claim of SocolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. In re the Claim of DominiqueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API