In re Senator
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*653OPINION OF THE COURT
Herlihy, J.
The claimant was initially determined by the local office of the respondent to be disqualified from benefits because of misconduct on the ground that "you were insubordinate”. The claimant requested a hearing and as a result thereof the board modified the initial determination to a disqualification because claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
The claimant testified that on March 14, 1979 he gave the employer "30 days notice”. The employer said that he did not need any notice and immediately terminated the employment. The board has found…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Claim of De GregoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re the Claim of MalaspinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- In re the Claim of BaidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- In re the Claim of CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In re the Claim of CantorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Claim of CrespoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of PepinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of DevlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of LukaszewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of OlkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.