Legal Opinion

Howell v. Wallace E. Johnson, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 21, 1956PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarney, J.

The plaintiffs below, T. M. Howell and wife Florence Evelyn Bennett Howell, brought separate suits for damages sustained when Mr. Howell drove his automobile into a manhole which was partially covered with dirt and which protruded about eight inches above the level of the street under construction in a new subdivision being developed by the defendant, Wallace E. Johnson, Inc. The causes were tried jointly to a jury twice.

On the first trial the jury awarded Mrs. Howell $8,000 damages for personal injuries and Mr. Howell $303 for damages to his automobile.

A judgment was entered on each of said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barnes v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. McLaughlin v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  3. National Life & Accident Ins. v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  4. Railroad v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  5. City of Nashville v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mize v. SkeenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  2. McCormic v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Dykes v. Meighan Construction CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Phipps v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
  5. Moore v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API