Legal Opinion

People v. Bormet

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1986No. 84-0587PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Defendant Allen Bormet was found guilty of a deceptive practice (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 17 — l(B)(d)) for knowingly issuing a check without sufficient funds. Following a bench trial defendant was sentenced to a six-month term of conditional discharge and ordered to make restitution in the amount of $3,661.94. Defendant appeals, contending that: (1) he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, (2) the trial court did not properly evaluate evidence that the check in question was in payment for previously delivered goods, (3) the complaint was fatally defective because it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. The People v. WeinsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. HousbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. OgunsolaIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. The PEOPLE v. MagnafichiIllinois Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alvin Marks v. Larry Carmody and Anthony CinquegraniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. EmbryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. People v. PetroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. People v. ShepardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API