People v. Housby
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon
In this appeal the court is concerned with the perplexing problems caused by the use of presumptions in criminal cases. Presumptions and inferences are evidentiary substitutes for the facts inferred. For that reason, instructions to a jury that it can infer an ultimate fact from a proved fact frequently raise due process objections. The thrust of these objections is that the presumption takes the place of strict proof of the elements of the offense, each of which must be established beyond a reasonable doubt. In re Winship (1970), 397 U.S. 358, 364, 25 L. Ed. 2d 368, 375, 90 S. Ct. 1068,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. NovakIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. BryantIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.