Legal Opinion

People v. Housby

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1981No. 53289PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

In this appeal the court is concerned with the perplexing problems caused by the use of presumptions in criminal cases. Presumptions and inferences are evidentiary substitutes for the facts inferred. For that reason, instructions to a jury that it can infer an ultimate fact from a proved fact frequently raise due process objections. The thrust of these objections is that the presumption takes the place of strict proof of the elements of the offense, each of which must be established beyond a reasonable doubt. In re Winship (1970), 397 U.S. 358, 364, 25 L. Ed. 2d 368, 375, 90 S. Ct. 1068,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. NovakIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. BryantIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API