Western Watersheds Project v. Interior Board of Land Appeals
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, which involves the interplay between the issuance or renewal of Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) grazing permits and the fee-shifting provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), Western Watersheds Project (“Western Watersheds”) appeals the summary judgment determination that EAJA fees were not available to Western Watersheds because its environmental claims were brought in a grazing permit renewal proceeding. We agree with the district court’s reasoning and affirm.
I. Background
A. Statutory and Regulatory Framework
1. The Taylor…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Idaho Watersheds Project v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Association Des Eleveurs De Canards Et D'Oies Du Quebec v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Western Watersheds Project v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Donald Eno v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Wecorp, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.