United States v. Tennessee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
The above captioned cases have been consolidated for purposes of this appeal. Community Rehabilitation Agencies of Tennessee (CMRA) appeals the decisions of the two district courts that denied its petitions to intervene as a matter of right pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a). Because CMRA’s petitions are untimely and it has not advanced any substantial right to intervene, its appeals are denied.
*591I. BACKGROUND
CMRA is an association of nonprofit agencies that provide services to retarded persons and those with mental disabilities in community…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Michigan State Afl-Cio v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Scotty Grubbs, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Proposed Intervenor/appellant v. Stephen H. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Timothy Jansen, Cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati v. Tilford Youngblood, Prospective Intervenors, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Norman Purnell, Administrator of the Estate of Armstead Land, A/K/A Armstad Land v. City of Akron v. Damon Campbell Carissa CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Blount-Hill v. ZelmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Dillard v. Chilton County CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Territory of the Virgin Islands Ex Rel. DiRuzzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- City of Chicago v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- In Re Contempt of Wabash Valley Hospital, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.