Legal Opinion

Timothy Jansen, Cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati v. Tilford Youngblood, Prospective Intervenors, Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1990No. 89-3783, 89-3828PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

A class of black applicants and black employees of the Division of Fire of the City of Cincinnati (“proposed inter-venors”) 1 appeal from the district court’s July 27, 1989 order denying their motion to intervene in this civil rights case. Plaintiffs Timothy Jansen, Daniel Geons, Robert Prasse, Evan Wood and Mark Monahan (“plaintiffs”) cross-appeal from the above-referenced order. The proposed inter-venors argue that because they have a significant interest in the litigation and their motion to intervene was timely, they should be permitted to intervene as a matter of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Scotty Grubbs, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Proposed Intervenor/appellant v. Stephen H. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Atlantis Development Corporation, Ltd. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Michigan State Afl-Cio v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re Christina Thompson, Debtor. Sanford A. Kowal v. Charles M. MalkemusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Norman Purnell, Administrator of the Estate of Armstead Land, A/K/A Armstad Land v. City of Akron v. Damon Campbell Carissa CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Kathy Stupak-Thrall,plaintiffs-Appellees v. Daniel Glickman,defendants, the Wilderness Society, Proposed Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. GranholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API