Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Chilton County Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 20, 2007No. 06-14950, 06-15354PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Per curiam

In these appeals, this court is confronted again by a third-party attempt to intervene in a long-pending case to vacate in-junctive relief entered below. Here, the challenged consent decree was obtained by a class of African-American plaintiffs as part of the landmark Dillard litigation that restructured much of Alabama’s county-level governance in accordance with the then-prevailing understanding of the Voting Rights Act. We recognize that the intervenors raise significant questions about the ongoing vitality of the remedy approved by the district court nearly twenty years ago. However, we…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Marnika Lewis v. Governor of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Flying J, Inc. v. Van HollenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. League of United Latin American Citizens v. City of BoerneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. South Florida Water Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. L. Lin Wood, Jr. v. Brad RaffenspergerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API