Legal Opinion

Thibodeau v. Slaney

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 21, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Kevin M. Thibodeau appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (Somerset County, Marsano, J.) determining that Thibodeau’s negligence claim was subject to the exclusivity provision of the Maine Liquor Liability Act 1 (MLLA) and vacating a jury verdict and judgment that had been entered in his favor. Thibodeau argues that it was error for the court to vacate the judgment because the facts of the case he presented were properly decided pursuant to his cause of action for negligence and did not fall within the scope of the MLLA. Daniel Slaney argues that the trial court’s judgment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Emery Waterhouse Co. v. LeaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. State v. HiltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Peters v. SaftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. State v. HindsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. Maine Energy Recovery Co. v. United Steel Structures, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. the Aube Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. Stewart v. MacHias Savings BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Morey v. StrattonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. Davis v. DionneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API