Legal Opinion

Peters v. Saft

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 18, 1991PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendants Scott Saft, Kershaw Powell, Richard Whitmore, and the State, intervening as a defendant, appeal the decision and order of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J) on plaintiff Edward Peters’ declaratory judgment action. Defendants challenge the court’s determination that the damage cap included in Maine’s Liquor Liability Act, 28-A M.R.S.A. §§ 2501-2519 (1988), violates both the state and federal equal protection clause. Plaintiff seeks to reinforce the court’s ruling by arguing that the offending provision also violates his right of due process, his right…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. English v. New England Medical Center, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Faucher v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. Fantastic Fair & Karmil Merchandising Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
  5. Baxter v. Waterville Sewerage DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Maurin v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API