Legal Opinion
Maine Energy Recovery Co. v. United Steel Structures, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 16, 1999PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] United Steel Structures, Inc. (“USS”) appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritz-sche, J.) after the court granted Maine Energy Recovery Company’s (“MERC’s”) renewed motion for a judgment as a matter of law pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 50(b) and set aside a jury verdict in favor of USS on MERC’s claims for breach of contract and breach of express warranty. USS contends that the court erred in vacating the jury verdict in favor of USS, entering a judgment for MERC as a matter of law, and awarding $3,334,400.50 in damages to MERC. We agree that the court erred…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Most v. MostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- C.N. Brown Co. v. GillenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Lewis v. KnowltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Townsend v. Chute Chemical Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Currier v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Budzko v. One City Center Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- St. Francis De Sales Federal Credit Union v. Sun Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Frank U. Wetmore v. MacDonald Page, Schatz, Fletcher & Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Philip C. Tobin v. Philip N. BarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- In Re Hannaford Bros. Co. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.