Legal Opinion

Jacobsen v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2012No. S-11-0120PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Chief Justice.

[11] A jury found Julie Ann Jacobsen guilty of ten felony counts involving forgery and larceny. She appeals the convictions, claiming her trial counsel was ineffective. She also asks this Court to allow her to supplement the trial record in order to prove her ineffective assistance claim. We decline Ms. Jacobsen's request to supplement the record and affirm her convictions.

ISSUES

[12] Ms. Jacobsen presents two issues for this Court's consideration:

Issue One: Did defense counsel fail to investigate this case, obtain documents and witnesses, including an expert, and therefore…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Calene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Rutti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ken v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Randy Ray Pickering v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Henry R. Sanchez v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State of Wyoming, Department of Family Services v. Tanya S. Currier and Ronnie HauckWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Anthony Joseph TeelWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API