Legal Opinion

Ken v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2011No. S-10-0103PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] A jury convicted Varo Ken of attempted first degree murder and aggravated assault. He appealed, asserting defense counsel provided ineffective assistance in several ways, including that he failed to file a timely motion for new trial. Mr. Ken also contended the evidence presented to the jury was insufficient to support his conviction for attempted first degree murder.1

[¶2] After docketing Mr. Ken's appeal, we remanded the case to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on his claim that counsel was ineffective. On remand, the parties stipulated that defense…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wallace v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gabriel R. Drennen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Osborne v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Fennell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Mark Daniel Byerly v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Michael Lee Cooper v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API