Legal Opinion
Dantzler v. S.P. Parks, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 10, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-4434PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of the defendant’s liability. In support of her motion, the plaintiff has used materials produced in discovery: deposition testimony and copies of the defendant’s First Aid Records, Incident Reports and Guest Injury Investigation Forms for the 1984 and 1985 seasons.
The standards to be observed in evaluating a motion for summary judgment are clear. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c) instructs a court to enter summary judgment when the record reveals that “there is no…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hartman v. Miller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1993