Business Financial Services, Inc. v. Butler & Booth Development Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
This appeal arose out of a garnishment action filed by appellee Business Financial Services, Inc. (BFS) in which appellant Butler and Booth Development Company (Butler & Booth) was required to state its indebtedness to Bernardino and Maria Medina, dba Bernardino Concrete Construction Company (Bernardino). Butler & Booth filed an answer to the writ of garnishment stating it was not indebted to Bernardino. BFS then filed a tender of issue claiming that Butler & Booth was indebted to Bernardino in the amount of $16,538. Cross-motions for summary judgment were filed. The trial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Farmers Acceptance Corp. v. DeLozierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- James Weller, Inc. v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Business Financial Services, Inc. v. AGN Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Gulf Homes, Inc. v. DM Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- Independent National Bank v. Westmoor Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Harris v. Dial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Hasse Contracting Co. v. KBK Financial, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sertich v. MoormanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Business Fin. Serv. v. BUTLER & BOOTH DEV.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.