Legal Opinion
Harris v. Dial Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 24, 1992No. 91-2556PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*991OPINION
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge:
This ease arises out of a dispute between two parties claiming a right to a company’s accounts receivable in satisfaction of debts owed by the company to each of the parties. The issue presented on appeal is whether the defendant has a right to offset its accounts receivable against the accounts receivable related to transactions between the defendant and the business held by the plaintiffs. The district court held that there was one agreement between the defendant and the business held by the plaintiffs, and that the defendant, therefore, had a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'Malley Investment and Realty Co. v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Valley Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Flagstaff DairyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Leeker v. MarcotteArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Business Financial Services, Inc. v. Butler & Booth Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brewster of Lynchburg, Incorporated v. Dial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and American Home Assurance Company v. Rotec Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Maine Farmers Exchange, Inc. v. Farm Credit of Maine, A.C.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Mayco Plastics, Inc. v. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. (In Re Mayco Plastics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Fidelity & Deposit v. Rotec Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.