Legal Opinion

James Weller, Inc. v. Hansen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 28, 1973No. 1 CA-CIV 1924PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEVENS, Judge.

The issues presented to this Court are the adequacy of a notice and claim of lien and the adequacy of the service thereof.

The persons or corporations essential to this litigation are: the plaintiffs, M. Leslie Hansen and Gloria Hansen, his wife, and since all of the business transactions were conducted by Mr. Hansen, the plaintiffs will be referred to herein as Hansen; James Weller, Inc., a corporation, and since all of the business was conducted by Mr. Weller, this corporation will be referred to herein as Weller; and the Cherokee Construction Company, a corporation,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. West v. SotoArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Peterman-Donnelly Engineers & Contractors Corp. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Kerr-McGee Oil Industries, Inc. v. McCrayArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Wylie v. Douglas Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Arizona Gunite Builders, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Commercial Cornice & Millwork, Inc. v. Camel Construction Services. Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Columbia Group, Inc. v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Smith Pipe & Steel Co. v. MeadArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Signal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API