Legal Opinion

Kafalian v. Kafalian

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirdie .Amsterdam, J.

Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice. Plaintiff and the defendant Dickron are husband and wife. The other defendant, Bose, is his daughter by a prior marriage. Plaintiff married Dickron on or about July 24, 1949. At that time he owned premises No. 2924 Morgan Avenue in the Borough of The Bronx. Some three years after the marriage, on or about September 25, 1952, Dickron transferred his ownership in said property to Ms daughter, Bose. Plaintiff claims such transfer was made without consideration and with the fraudulent intent and purpose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Enthoven v. EnthovenNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Enthoven v. EnthovenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Leitman v. LeitmanNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Bishop v. BishopNew York Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matthews v. SchusheimNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Smith v. SmithCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  3. Wiesenfeld v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  4. Boatswain v. Univac Division, Sperry Rand Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  5. Wiesenfeld v. State of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API