Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Bishop

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss the complaint herein under rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice on the ground that the complaint on its face fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint alleges that an action for separation has been commenced by the plaintiff wife against the defendant husband, and that such action is pending and undetermined; that on August 4, 1952, an order in the separation action was made and entered granting the plaintiff the sum of $35 a week as temporary alimony; that the defendant at the time the said separation action accrued and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Romaine v. . ChaunceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Doncourt v. DoncourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Enthoven v. EnthovenNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Weber v. WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eccles v. HutchinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Kafalian v. KafalianNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Jagiello v. JagielloNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API