Legal Opinion
Matthews v. Schusheim
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnthony M. Livoti, J.
By a notice of motion dated May 25, 1962, the plaintiff moved for an order appointing a receiver pendente lite of the properties which are subject to this action, pursuant to article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law, on the ground that there is danger that said properties will be removed beyond the court’s jurisdiction during the pendency of the action and will be materially injured or destroyed before a final judgment can be obtained.
The complaint in this consolidated action contains three causes of action. The first cause of action is against defendant Mark Matthews, etc., for damages…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Ga Nun v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Pattison v. PattisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Buttles v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Parker v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Liggio v. LiggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Wiesenfeld v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Bowler v. BowlerNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Wiesenfeld v. State of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.