Legal Opinion
Boatswain v. Univac Division, Sperry Rand Corp.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided December 15, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHakry T. Nusbatjm, J.
This action was instituted pursuant to the provisions of CPLR 3213 by the service of a summons together with a notice of motion for summary judgment. The genesis of the action lies in a certain proceeding for support brought under article 4 of the Family Court Act in the Family Court of the City of New York, County of Queens, and the failure of the defendant Univac Division, Sperry Rand Corp., to fully comply with the terms of a “ payroll deduction order ’ ’ issued out of that court in that proceeding. The order, which directs the said defendant to deduct and withhold from the salary, wages…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Morse v. MorseNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Kafalian v. KafalianNew York Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Drenttel v. Jensen-Carter (In Re Drenttel)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- In Re ThomasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Menon v. WeilCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
- Bradley Drenttel v. Mary Jensen-CarterUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004