Legal Opinion

Gumm v. Koepke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 15, 1938:

Nelson, J.

The sole question for decision is whether the trial court erred in changing the answers of the jury respecting the negligence of the interpleaded defendant, Oates, as set forth in the statement of facts. The said defendants con*638tend that the court erred in changing said answers. The in-terpleaded defendants contend that it did not. It has been held over and over again that the question for determination in such situations is whether there is any credible evidence which in any reasonable view fairly admits of' an inference that supports…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gauthier v. CarbonneauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Pettera v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Svenson v. VondrakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Duss v. FriessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ide v. WamserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Bokelkamp v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Better Properties, Inc. v. KocherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hafemann v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Cranston v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API