Bokelkamp v. Olson

The appellant contends that the charge to the jury as to the respective rights of the parties immediately before the collision was erroneous and misleading arid constituted prejudicial error. A portion of the charge was as follows:

“Now the defendant Olson was obliged to stop his automobile before entering Highway 16 and the exact point at which he was obliged to stop is not designated by any provision of the statute. He must come to a stop at least at the time he reaches the stop and go sign and he must stop at such a place before entering the other highway, the arterial highway, as will give…