Legal Opinion

People v. Auer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 18, 2014No. 14PDJ006Published

1Opinion of the Court

*137OPINION AND DECISION IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.19(c)

I. SUMMARY

In this case, Respondent, who is not a licensed attorney in the State of Colorado, intentionally practiced law in this state for more than three years without the supervision of a licensed lawyer. He also engaged in dishonest conduct by intentionally holding himself out as a licensed Colorado attorney to his clients. The Court finds that the appropriate sanction is disbarment.

II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The People filed their complaint on January 7, 2014. A copy of the complaint and citation were served upon Respondent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. People v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. In Re FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. In Re RosenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  5. In re Attorney F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API