People v. Auer
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
*137OPINION AND DECISION IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.19(c)
I. SUMMARY
In this case, Respondent, who is not a licensed attorney in the State of Colorado, intentionally practiced law in this state for more than three years without the supervision of a licensed lawyer. He also engaged in dishonest conduct by intentionally holding himself out as a licensed Colorado attorney to his clients. The Court finds that the appropriate sanction is disbarment.
II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The People filed their complaint on January 7, 2014. A copy of the complaint and citation were served upon Respondent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- People v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- In Re FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- In Re RosenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- In re Attorney F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.