Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2000No. 97-4693A-FE; CA A102399; 97-4823A-FE; CA A102400; 98-2081-MI; CA A102401PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence obtained in a warrantless search of an automobile, arguing that the search fell under the “automobile exception” to the warrant requirement. We conclude that the automobile exception does not apply and that the warrantless search therefore violated Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. Accordingly, we affirm.

On October 9, 1997, police executed a warrant authorizing a search of a Medford residence for evidence relating to the manufacture and distribution of methamphetamine. In the course of executing that warrant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. KockOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. SmalleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. GetzelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API