Legal Opinion

State v. Smalley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 20, 2010No. 074980FE, A138399PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

The state appeals an order suppressing evidence found during a warrantless search of defendant’s backpack. ORS 138.060(l)(c). It argues that the search was lawful under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Medford Police Officer Jewell conducted a lawful traffic stop of a pickup truck in which defendant was a passenger. During the course of that stop, Jewell obtained the driver’s consent to search the truck. Upon opening the driver’s-side door, Jewell noticed the odor of marijuana. When he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. MeharryOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Robinson, Williams & Spriggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. State v. AcunaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. People v. McKnightColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API