Legal Opinion
Russell Petroleum Co. v. Walker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 7, 1933No. 24072PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The plaintiff in error commenced an action against the defendants in error in the district court of Oklahoma county. The trial court held that it was “* * * without power, jurisdiction or authority to enjoin the Corporation Commission or the defendants Paul Walker, Roy Iíugihes, and Ci O. Ohilders, constituting staid, Commission, from trying the plaintiff upon any charge, * * *” and that it was “* * * without power, jurisdiction, or authority to enjoin the defendant Cicero I. Murray, his agents, and servants, and those acting under his direction as prayed in plaintiff’s petition. * * *” From…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. CapshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Epletveit v. SolbergMontana Supreme Court · 1946
- COMPSOURCE MUTUAL INSUR. CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. TAX COMM. and OKLA. ASSOC. OF ELECTRIC SELF INSURERS FUND v. STATE OF OKLA. TAX COMM.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- State Ex Rel. Murray v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.