Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Berkheimer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order granting Appellee’s request for blood testing in an action for paternal support. 1 For the reasons set forth below, we vacate.

¶ 2 Appellant is the mother of a son who was born on June 13, 1999. At the time of the child’s birth, Appellant lived with Ap-pellee, the putative father. Mother and Appellee never married. Mother informed Appellee before the birth of her baby that she did not believe he was the child’s biological father. However, Appellee insisted that there was a “possibility” that he might be David’s biological father. At the hearing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Brinkley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Jones v. TrojakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Fish v. BehersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Freedman v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keystone Filler & Mfg. Co. v. American Mining InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. D.M. v. V.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. N.C. v. M.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. T.L.F. v. D.W.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. N.C. v. M.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API