Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Rice, Hoppner, Brown & Brunner

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1984No. 7509, 7537PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHEWS, Justice.

This appeal concerns the priority of claims to fire insurance proceeds recovered by Richard and Adriana Van Hatten for the destruction of their house. Appellee, Rice, Hoppner, Brown & Brunner (hereafter Rice), represented the Van Hattens in litigation to obtain the insurance proceeds, and also in arson and perjury criminal charges against them. Rice claims the insurance proceeds through an attorney’s lien and assignments from the Van Hat-tens. Appellant, Alice McKnight, was injured in an automobile accident with Richard Van Hatten. She and her husband obtained a court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Begelfer v. NajarianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. California Pacific Bank, a California Banking Corporation v. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. People ex rel. Alexander v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BarnessDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. In Re BongfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re the Estate of FieldsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Rausch v. DevineAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Journey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API