In re Estate of Carriger
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, refusing to set aside a homestead. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Kate C. Carriger is the widow of William W. Carriger, deceased, and appeals from an order of the superior court, in probate, denying her petition for a homestead.
After the death of the husband, Solomon Carriger produced what purported to be the last will and testament of the deceased, in which he was named as executor, but the widow contested the probate thereof, and, pending these proceedings, said Solomon Carriger was appointed special administrator, and saffi contest not having been finally determined, he has ever since been, and still is, such special administrator; and, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wolf v. FleischackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- In re the Estate of NoahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Walkerly v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- First National Bank v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Kingsley v. KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kachigian v. KachigianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Schoonover v. BirnbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Rosenthal v. Merced BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re Estate of CarragharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- In re SterlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.