Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Noah

California Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1887No. 11635PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from, an order of the- Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing to set apart a homestead. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.

Deceased left a will wherein no provision was made for his widow, Harriet T. Noah, the appellant. The will was duly probated September 28, 1883, and on the sixth day of August, 1884, appellant *591petitioned the Superior Court for an order setting apart a homestead out of the real property of the. estate, “ or for such other or different order as may be just and proper in the premises.” There was no community property, and the only separate real property of the deceased at the time of his death was a certain lot in San Francisco, covered entirely or partially by a brick building four stories…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. In Re Estate of NiccollsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Kachigian v. KachigianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In Re Estate of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. In re AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API