Legal Opinion
Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. HTC Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 6, 2012No. 09 C 2945PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Intellect Wireless, Inc. (“IW”) has accused defendants HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively “HTC”) of infringing U.S. Patent No. 7,266,186 (“the '186 patent”) entitled “Method and Apparatus for Improved Paging Receiver and System” and U.S. Patent No. 7,310,416 (“the '416 patent”) entitled “Method and Apparatus for Improved Personal Communication Devices and System.” It is alleged that HTC has infringed the patents by making or selling “wireless portable communication devices…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. HTC CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. Sharp Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. Sharp Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Power Probe Group, Inc. v. Innova Electronics CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023