Legal Opinion
California Standard Finance Corp. v. Bessolo & Gualano, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 16, 1931No. Docket No. 6867PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
From the record herein it appears that Bessolo and Gualano, Inc., a corporation, executed its promissory note .for the sum of $15,000 in favor of one Balfour; that later the payee of said note, together with Bessolo and Gualano, each as individuals, executed a guarantee of payment thereof, and thereupon delivered it to the plaintiff, together with a certain bond executed by the defendant Fidelity Union Casualty Company, which purportedly also guaranteed the payment of said note, and which latter instrument was as follows, to-wit:
“Fidelity Union Casualty Company
“Dallas
“No. 79807 Bond
“........No…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- S.F. T. Seminary v. Monterey County G. & E. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Grace v. CroningerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Murphy v. Luthy Battery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- California Standard Finance Corp. v. Bessolo & Gualano, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Anderson v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Karsh v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932