People v. R.O.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, J.
This case raises the question whether the juvenile court has discretion to set a lesser term of confinement than the indeterminate sentence applicable to an adult convicted of the same offense as the juvenile. We conclude that the juvenile court has discretion to set a lesser maximum term of confinement “based upon the facts and circumstances of the matter.” Therefore, we will remand the case to the court to exercise that discretion. In all other respects, the court’s orders are affirmed.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
The Compton Varios 70s (CV70’s) and the Compton Varios…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex parte Ah PeenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- People v. Carlos E.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. Charles G.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. H.D.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Joseph M.California Court of Appeal · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Greg F.California Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. A.G.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Greg F.California Supreme Court · 2012
- In re L.H.California Court of Appeal · 2025