Legal Opinion

Ex parte Ah Peen

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876No. 10,203PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court to be discharged on habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

It appears by the return to the writ that in August last the police judge of the city and county of San Francisco, upon application and complaint made to him in that behalf by two citizens of the State, residents of the city and county, alleging that Ah Peen, the legality of whose detention is in question here, is a minor child, of the age of sixteen years, leading an idle and dissolute life in said city and county, and not subject to any parental control whatever— his parents being unknown—caused the said Ah Peen to be brought before him for examination touching the said several…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re DaedlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Cinque v. BoydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. Wissenburg v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Leroy T. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Crocker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API