Legal Opinion
People v. Charles G.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 2004No. C041288PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, P. J.
Juvenile delinquency laws permit a juvenile court to retain jurisdiction over a ward until he or she reaches the age of 21 or, in some circumstances, the age of 25. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 607, subds. (a) & (b); further section references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.)
Charles G. (appellant), still a ward of the juvenile court at the age of 20 based upon his delinquent conduct, violated terms of his probation. Probation was reinstated on the condition that he serve a period of confinement. On appeal, he contends that (1) the juvenile court lacked authority to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Flannery v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Daly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. West Coast Shows, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. Ramon M.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Jeffrey T.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Sonoma County Human Services Department v. J.H.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Jose S. (In re Jose S.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. A.S. (In re A.S.), California Court of Appeal, 1st District2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.