Brooktrails Township Com. Services Dept. v. Bd. Super. Mendocino Cty. CA1/2
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
Proposition 218, adopted by the voters in 1996, added articles XIII C and XIII D to the California Constitution. 1 One of its most prominent features was to tighten the two-thirds voter approval requirement for “special” taxes and assessments imposed by Proposition 13. (Art. XIII A, § 4; Art. XIIIC, § 2, subd. (d); see art. XIII D, §§ 3, 4, subd. (g), 6, subd. (c).) 2 In Paland v. Brooktrails Township Community Services Dist. Bd. of Directors (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 1358 [102 Cal.Rptr.3d 270] (Paland I), Division Five of this appellate district concluded that “a minimum…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Pearson)California Supreme Court · 2010
- Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. VerjilCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- City of San Diego v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- California Public Records Research, Inc. v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Webb v. City of Riverside, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.