Legal Opinion

Brooktrails Township Com. Services Dept. v. Bd. Super. Mendocino Cty. CA1/2

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 2013No. A135900UnpublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHMAN, J.

Proposition 218, adopted by the voters in 1996, added articles XIII C and XIII D to the California Constitution. 1 One of its most prominent features was to tighten the two-thirds voter approval requirement for “special” taxes and assessments imposed by Proposition 13. (Art. XIII A, § 4; Art. XIIIC, § 2, subd. (d); see art. XIII D, §§ 3, 4, subd. (g), 6, subd. (c).) 2 In Paland v. Brooktrails Township Community Services Dist. Bd. of Directors (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 1358 [102 Cal.Rptr.3d 270] (Paland I), Division Five of this appellate district concluded that “a minimum…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Pearson)California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. VerjilCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. City of San Diego v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. California Public Records Research, Inc. v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Webb v. City of Riverside, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API