Legal Opinion

Shore v. Shore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 23, 1972No. 7210DC485PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

An order of a court of this State for alimony or alimony pendente lite may be modified or vacated upon motion in the cause and a showing of changed circumstances by either party. G.S. 50-16.9(a). However, “[t]he burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a material change in the circumstances has occurred is upon the party requesting the modification.” 2 Lee, North Carolina Family Law 3d, § 153, p. 230.

The record on appeal in the present case does not show what evidence, if any, was presented by appellant to the trial court in support of his motion. The record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North American Acceptance Corp. v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. In Re the Sale of Land of WarrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Zande v. ZandeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Broughton v. BroughtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Gilmore v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Outlaw v. OutlawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API