Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Gilmore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 1979No. 787DC863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Prior to consideration of this action on the merits, we offer this observation concerning plaintiffs preparation of the Record on Appeal. Plaintiff has sufficiently set out in the record her exceptions to the judgment of the court. See North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 10(b)(2). However, plaintiff has placed unnecessarily repetitious matter in the record. In the interest of economy of expense and judicial time, plaintiff should have set out her exceptions within the order as it properly appears in the record on pages 52 through 59. It was unnecessarily…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. West v. WestSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Goodhouse v. DeFravioCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Dishmon v. DishmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Fischell v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Outlaw v. OutlawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API