Legal Opinion
Honeywell, Inc. v. Sperry Rand Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 8, 1971No. 4-67-Civ. 138PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, District Judge.
This matter came before this Court on a petition by Iowa State University Research Foundation (hereinafter ISURF) to intervene in the lawsuit currently in progress involving Honeywell, Inc. v. Sperry Rand Corporation and Illinois Scientific Developments, Inc., for purposes of obtaining a certificate naming John V. Atanasoff as a joint inventor in United States Patent 3,120,606. ISURF is assignee of all rights of Atanasoff in said patent. ISURF does not desire to present any testimony or in fact to intervene in or vary in any manner the proceedings at trial. It feels…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Smith Petroleum Service, Inc. v. Monsanto Chemical Company, Monsanto Chemical Company v. Smith Petroleum Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- McCormick Harvesting MacHine Co. v. AultmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Cameron v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Johnson & Johnson v. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. Honeywell, Inc. v. Sperry Rand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Reserve Mining Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1976