Legal Opinion
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Rhodes
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1968No. Nos. 8379, 8562, 9091, 10002PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
The validity of numerous rulings made by the trial court during protracted litigation concerning the asserted violation of the federal civil rights of one Paul E. Rhodes is presented here for our review. Since four correlative appeals are involved — Nos. 8379, 8562, 9091, and 10,002 — a short statement of the relevant facts should prove helpful in bringing the various issues presented into proper focus.
The circumstances giving rise to this litigation originated in 1960 in a Nebraska state district court, when Rhodes was convicted in absentia of *4contempt of court and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Carl C. Coppinger v. Gene Townsend, M.D., and Wayne K. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Warren Jobson v. Frank R. Henne, Edward D. Stevenson, Murray Bergman and Michael SemchyshynCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Giordano v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Mantz v. FollingstadNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Higgins v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.