Wall v. Marshutz Cantrell
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
This is a suit for damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff, resulting in the amputation of a leg, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants. The case was tried by a jury, who found for the plaintiff in the sum of five thousand dollars, and judgment was entered accordingly. The defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for new trial. The principal questions in the case are as to the sufficiency of the evidence to show negligence on the part of the defendants and as to certain instructions of the court, with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Burns v. Sennett & MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Williams v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Dennison v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Van den Heuvel v. National Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lively v. American Zinc Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Towne v. United Electric Gas & Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Vanyi v. Portland Flouring Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Bailey v. Cascade Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Foutz v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.