Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Cascade Timber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1903No. 4640PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. William H. Shell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

Appellant was employed by respondent as the engineer of what is known as a “donkey steam engine.” The engine was operated in respondent’s logging camp for the purpose of moving and loading logs. In *322the course of logging operations it became necessary from time to time to remove the engine from one location to another. It stood upon pieces of timber adjusted somewhat as the runners of a sled. Its removal was accomplished by means of the mechanism of a strong cable with hooks and pulleys so operated by the power of the engine itself that it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allend v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Sroufe v. Moran Bros. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hammarberg v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Nelson v. S. Willey Steamship & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Uren v. Golden Tunnel Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arneson v. Grant Smith & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Vanyi v. Portland Flouring Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Bailey v. Cascade Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Sullivan v. R. D. Wood & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API