Hanley v. Stewart
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss.
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
1. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The facts are that a decree in this suit was given September 11, 1908, and 11 days thereafter a notice and an undertaking on appeal were served and filed. No exception was taken to the sufficiency of the sureties on the undertaking, and the appeal was perfected September 27, 1908 (Section 549, B. & C. Comp.), but no abstract or transcript on appeal was filed within 30 days therefrom, as required. Section 553, B. & C. Comp. The trial court, on motion of the appellant, December 16, 1909, dismissed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mendenhall v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Matlock v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Nestucca Wagon Road Co. v. LandinghamOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Nottingham v. McKendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Harrington v. SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Magierowski v. BuckleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Petrone v. MargolisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Minogue v. LipmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Columbia City Land Co. v. BuhlOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Minogue v. LipmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.